Book of Mormon Feast


Home     Music     Art     God     Library     Network     Contact

Home Musical Book of Mormon Tour Artistic Book of Mormon Tour God in the Book of Mormon Book of Mormon Library Weblinks - Book of Mormon Websites

God in 2 Nephi 2


God • Great Mediator • He Who Knoweth All  Things

Holy Messiah • Holy One • Holy Spirit • Lord God

Messiah • Redeemer • Spirit


2 Nephi 2:12


The Book of Mormon  teaches that

individual choice is essential to God’s plan of mercy and justice


Wherefore, it must needs have been created for a thing of naught;

wherefore there would have been no purpose in the end of its creation.

Wherefore, this thing must needs destroy the wisdom of God and his eternal purposes, and also the power, and the mercy, and the justice of God.


Thus Lehi emphasizes the foundational concept and reality of agency, the freedom to choose.  We may say that lack of choice opposes God’s plan of choice, but Lehi says it much stronger: it actually destroys God’s wisdom, eternal purposes, power, mercy, and justice.  Wow!

Therefore, by God’s power He assures that every soul has choice.  This is a major part of the atonement of Christ.  Without the atonement, we would not be able to choose to return to God, after having committed our first sin.  

His eternal purpose, as expressed in Moses 1:39, is to help His children attain eternal life with Him.  Just as He is free in all that He does, we, too must be free to choose or reject this life that He offers.

Fortunately, it is His wisdom that establishes and maintains this opportunity of choice for all of His children.  Where we humans may look at a person’s childhood and conclude that they were set on a course, either of righteousness or destruction, and really had no choice in the matter, it is only by faith that we can believe otherwise.  Each person whose parents brought him up in light and truth will encounter in his life powerful temptations and persuasions that will point him away from the strait and narrow way.  He may choose.  Each person with a deprived or depraved childhood will also encounter good and caring people, people who will be willing to teach him of his divine potential and the love of God.  He may choose.  As Latter-day Saints we recognize that, particularly in the latter case, these opportunities continue to arise in the life after this mortal life.  “Thus was the gospel preached to the dead.  And the chosen messengers went forth to declare the acceptable day of the Lord and proclaim liberty to the captives who were bound, even unto all who would repent of their sins and receive the gospel.”  (Doctrine & Covenants 138:30,31)

If God did not provide every opportunity of healing – things we cannot even conceive of in this life – for the wounded, abandoned, and sinful souls, he would not be merciful.  If He did not allow adequate opportunities for His faithful and privileged saints to be lured into wandering side paths, he would not be just.


2 Nephi 2:13


If ye say there is no law, ye also say there is no sin

The Book of Mormon shows the necessity of law and punishment, that righteousness and happiness may exist


And if ye shall say there is no law, ye shall also say there is no sin.

If ye shall say there is no sin, ye shall also say there is no righteousness.

And if there be no righteousness there be no happiness.

And if there be no righteousness nor happiness there be no punishment nor misery.

And if these things are not there is no God.

And if there is no God we are not, neither the earth;

for there could have been no creation of things, neither to act nor to be acted upon; wherefore, all things must have vanished away.


Law is first.  Law defines reactions.  If you combine A and B you will get the compound C.  If you want the product C, then you must combine the reagents A and B in a certain way.  If you do D, then the consequence F will ensue.  If your objective is E, then you must follow process G.  

To say there is no law is to step backward in human historical understanding of science.  If there is no law, yet there is existence and process and results, then it all happens by magic.         

Sin is breaking the law.  We operate under the assumption that the product everyone wants is eternal life.  Sin is not combining A and B.  It is disregarding instructions.  Sin is any deviation from the process that leads to the desired product.  The result will not be eternal life.

To say there is no sin likewise is belief in magic. It is belief that there is no correlation between cause and effect.  Magic again.  Or it is denial that there is any particularly desirable end result, and life is meaningless.

Righteousness is following the directives of the law.  A righteous person respects that the law exists, and that his life will be governed by the law.  He avoids sin, and tries continually to do what is required by the law.

To say there is no righteousness is to deny that any acts are good or bad in and of themselves.  They are only relative and situational, independent of any eternal truth or goal.  “Man is the measure of man.”

I do not presume to define happiness.  Just as one cannot describe the salty taste to one who has not experienced it, and that only involves one biological function, happiness, being much more multi-faceted, defies my ability to distill it into words.  It is the “object and design of our existence,” according to Joseph Smith.  Webster’s 1828 definition begins, “The agreeable sensations which spring from the enjoyment of good,” thus correlating happiness with righteousness.

Here the narrative changes.  The law-deniers, sin-deniers, righteousness-deniers do not deny happiness.  Lehi says that what they interpret as happiness is not.  Jesus says that “the devil laugheth and his angels rejoice” at the great destruction of people (3 Nephi 9:2).  Alma says, “Wickedness never was happiness” (Alma 41:10).  Lehi will go on in this chapter to assert that man’s ultimate purpose is to “have joy” (2 Nephi 2:25), and that the devil became “miserable forever” (2 Nephi 2:17).  His laughter does not equate with happiness.  The “happiness” that people feel when committing sin must be comparable to the high that drug users experience – a momentary pleasure (however you define that), followed by a crash.  The fire burns down to worthless ashes.

As truth is “knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come” (Doctrine & Covenants 93:24), so true happiness will extend eternally.  It can be found all over the path that leads to God, in doing any of the myriad things both commanded explicitly in the scriptures, and every other act or thought that increases one’s abilities and understanding of anything, as one develops to become a whole and complete person, a unique child of God.

No one denies happiness.  But they misidentify their fleeting pleasures for happiness.

Punishment is suffering the consequences of one’s actions.  It’s the ultimate realization that there is no magic.  All roads do not lead to God, but each road does lead somewhere.  Punishment is what people experience at the end of their chosen road, if they have not chosen to follow God’s laws and seek for the kingdom of heaven.

Of course the deniers vehemently deny punishment, and are rabidly hateful toward the God of the Old Testament, where punishment is so often discussed.

Misery is the absence of happiness.  When a person has “sought for happiness in doing iniquity” (Helaman 13:38) he finds himself the hapless victim, and yet the compliant participant, in an eternal bait-and-switch scam.

The deniers ultimately prefer to come to the conclusion that there is no God.  Or if there is a God, He set the physical universe in motion then stepped back to do whatever an all-powerful being does for fun.  But He doesn’t tell us how to live our lives.  Oh, no, He’s too great for that.

Lehi almost waxes sarcastic as he describes that “we are not,” all things have “vanished away.”  It has been evident throughout all cultures that God is, because we can all see the wonderful creations of the earth that He placed us on.  In Lehi’s society, where common sense decreed that where there is a complex creation there must be a thoughtful Creator, he had proven his point.   Curiously, in this generation where we know so much more of the earth, the deep complexity of every aspect of life, the genetic code of DNA, the atomic world, the subatomic world, the forces of nature and their perfect balance on our planet, the many planets throughout the universe – we can see and understand so much more of His creation, and yet with all this information our culture manages to deny a Creator.

In speaking of the creation, Lehi lists only two types of things:  thing to act and things to be acted upon.  Certainly people are to act.  Too many people relegate aspects of their lives to being “acted upon” as they take a victim stance, blaming others for their circumstances and lack of progress: parents, society, school, race, “lack of opportunity.”  Other people treat their fellowman as something to be “acted upon” as they steal and abuse and subjugate at all levels of society.  

I hesitate to define anything to be “acted upon.”  I would have thought that all the non-living universe was in that category, except that Jesus said “the stones would cry out” and worship Him, if His disciples did not (Luke 19:40).  Enoch spoke of the earth as a sentient being, who cried, “Wo, wo is me, the mother of men; I am pained, I am weary, because of the wickedness of my children.  When shall I rest, and be cleansed from the filthiness which is gone forth out of me?  When will my Creator sanctify me, that I may rest, and righteousness for a season abide upon my face?” (Moses 7:48).  If the earth and the stones of the earth are not to be acted upon, what is?  Can it be that things to be acted upon have some sort of awareness, if not volition?

As with so much of Lehi’s dissertation to Jacob, this whole verse is a study in contrasts all originating in law:  sin and righteousness, happiness and misery, God and no God, creation and vanishing away, acting and being acted upon.  The contrasts all point to choice, and the eternal importance of making the right choices.


2 Nephi 2:14


There is a God, and He hath created all things

The Book of Mormon teaches that

it is to our profit to acknowledge that there is a God


And now, my sons, I speak unto you these things for your profit and learning;

for there is a God, and he hath created all things, both the heavens and the earth,

and all things that in them are, both things to act and things to be acted upon.


Lehi has proven that there is no absence of a God.  He now testifies in the affirmative that God is, and that God is the creator of all things.  This witness is meant to appeal to the individual bents of his sons, both those who appreciate learning, and those who are more focused on “profit” – what’s in it for me.  He created all things in the heavens and earth – those extremes encompass everything.  He created all things that act or are acted upon – a binary whole.  By contrasts Lehi describes universality.


2 Nephi 2:15


To bring about His eternal purposes

The Book of Mormon teaches that

God gave meaning to His vast creations when He assured our ability to choose


And to bring about his eternal purposes in the end of man,

after he had created our first parents, and the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and in fine, all things which are created, it must needs be that there was an opposition; even the forbidden fruit in opposition to the tree of life;

the one being sweet and the other bitter.


His eternal purposes are related to the end of man, to man’s final exalted destiny with God.  Everything He does furthers that goal.  All things on the earth not only point to the existence of the Creator, but they are to facilitate and enhance man’s mortality in the hopes that he will look upward to the Creator, that he will learn to think and plan as the Creator does.  This was not enough.  We needed genuine choices of good and evil, and that’s what the forbidden fruit provided.  We often think that “opposition” means the opposing team, against which we are fighting.  But we do not go to a sporting event considering the possibility of switching loyalties. A better definition would be “alternative.”  A better comparison would be shopping.  We go to the store and make choices among competing brands and products.  God’s plan requires that we have full choices.

Lehi says that the fruit of one of the trees is sweet, and the other bitter, but he does not specify which.  

Of course, he has earlier, when expounding on his vision, testified to the sweetness of the fruit of the tree of life (“It was most sweet, above all that I ever before tasted.” 1 Nephi 8:11)  Alma will later say it is “sweet above all that is sweet” (Alma 32:42)  Those who have experienced the love and grace of Christ know this for themselves.

This would leave the forbidden fruit, the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, to be bitter.  In this mortal milieu who has not learned or realized something one really didn’t want to know, what one did not expect, what one wishes were not reality?  That fruit gave individual choice to all mankind.  Who has not experienced bitter pangs as a result of one’s own choices, or those of others?

On the other hand, the delineation may not be so simple.  If every bad choice came with immediate consequences, that would hamper our agency to choose.  We are allowed to make bad choices and pretend that they are good, individually and as a society, so that we may choose to develop a liking, a taste for the good.  We can get accustomed to anything.  We can “put darkness for light and light for darkness, put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter” (2 Nephi 15:20).  

John the Revelator’s mission experience was that it would be sweet as honey in his mouth, but bitter in his stomach (Revelation 10:9-11) (which mirrors Ezekiel’s experience, Ezekiel 3:3).   

Harold B. Lee said, “The forbidden fruit was sweet, but the tree of life was bitter, and how like life that is. Sometimes the things that are best for us and the things that bring eternal rewards seem at the moment to be the most bitter, and the things forbidden are ofttimes the things which seem to be the more desirable.”


2 Nephi 2:16


The Lord God gave unto man that he should act for himself

The Book of Mormon teaches that

one cannot choose unless there actually are choices


Wherefore, the Lord God gave unto man that he should act for himself.

Wherefore, man could not act for himself

save it should be that he was enticed by the one or the other.


Lehi says man must be enticed by the one or the other, but I suggest that he must be enticed by both one and the other.  

As I discussed in verse 12, God’s justice and mercy assure that everyone truly will be able to act for themselves and to judge for themselves and to choose for themselves, whatever their genetic make-up or familial environment.  Members of the two teams may entice, but no one can drag another to heaven, nor force another to hell.  We have company as we travel the roads to these destinations, but we walk alone.


2 Nephi 2:17


The Book of Mormon teaches that the devil was an angel of God who chose evil


And I, Lehi, according to the things which I have read,

must needs suppose that an angel of God, according to that which is written,

had fallen from heaven; wherefore, he became a devil,

having sought that which was evil before God.


In his great vision (1 Nephi 11-14), Nephi wrote extensively about the devil and his works.  He is never really introduced or explained, but it is a given that he is behind all the bad things that happen contrary to God’s plan, and he has his own plan.

A popular complaint against God today, in fact, against believing in the good, all-powerful God described in the Bible, is to question why a good, all-powerful Being would make something evil.  Lehi had observed his sons, in the same circumstances, make different choices, and he knew, in a very personal way, how active the devil was in his work.  Lehi must have spent some time pondering the devil problem, and wondering where he came from.  Apparently the Lord did not give him a revelation on the devil’s origins, as he did to Isaiah (Isaiah 14:12) and Moses (Moses 4:1-4).  Lehi emphasized that he sought for answers in the scriptures, and came to understand that the devil had originally been created as an angel.  He chose to become a devil, because he chose evil over God’s plan.

In this whole chapter, a concerned and possibly grieving father Lehi is teaching his sons about agency and accountability.  He recognizes that agency is a gift from God, but he also recognizes that on the other side of the coin, the devil had used his own agency, in the midst of the best of circumstances and teaching, to reject God’s goodness and make and follow a different way.



PREVIOUS NEXT